Penerapan Kontrak Konstruksi Berbasis FIDIC dalam Proyek Jalan Tol Indonesia: Kajian Normatif terhadap Undang-Undang Jasa Konstruksi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65310/vfhfek84Kata Kunci:
FIDIC Contract, Construction Law, Toll Road Projects, Dispute Resolution, Normative Harmonization.Abstrak
The application of FIDIC-based construction contracts in Indonesian toll road projects raises significant normative questions regarding their compatibility with the national legal framework. This study employs a normative legal approach, combining statutory, conceptual, and comparative analyses to examine the alignment between FIDIC contractual structures and Indonesian Construction Services Law, the Civil Code, and the Arbitration Act. The findings indicate that while FIDIC reflects common law traditions emphasizing party autonomy, detailed risk allocation, and multi-tier dispute resolution mechanisms, Indonesian law imposes mandatory norms that limit contractual freedom in the interest of public order and legal certainty. Normative tensions primarily arise in clauses concerning risk distribution, variations, claims management, and the finality of dispute board and arbitral decisions. Nevertheless, these tensions do not render FIDIC inapplicable. Instead, adaptive drafting and systematic interpretation enable its integration within the Indonesian civil law system. Proper harmonization ensures that FIDIC contracts remain legally valid while supporting efficiency, certainty, and accountability in the delivery of strategic toll road infrastructure projects.
Unduhan
Referensi
Abdul-Malak, M.-A., & Tabbara, L. M. (2023). Experts involved in claims and disputes resolution: Mapping and classification of engagement possibilities. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/jladah.ladr-930
Clarissa, S., et al. (n.d.). Manajemen proyek.
Fawzy, S. A., et al. (2018). Civil law context for understanding employer’s payment obligations under common law FIDIC. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000285
FIDIC. (1999). Conditions of contract for construction for building and engineering works designed by the employer (1st ed.). International Federation of Consulting Engineers.
Hamzani, A. I., et al. (2023). Legal research method: Theoretical and implementative review. International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology, 10(2), 3610. https://doi.org/10.15379/ijmst.v10i2.3191
Hanafi, K., et al. (2023). Regulasi dalam meningkatkan kehutanan berkelanjutan melalui politik hukum yang efektif di Indonesia.
Hardjomuljadi, S. (2011). The main causal factors of construction claims under FIDIC contract in Indonesia. SSRN Electronic Journal [Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1898436
Hasana, N., Mustopa, M., & Faizal, E. A. (2023). Akibat hukum perjanjian penyelesaian sengketa perbankan syariah (Kajian terhadap klausula pilihan forum penyelesaian sengketa di Pengadilan Negeri). Al-Muamalat Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 10(2), 55. https://doi.org/10.15575/am.v10i2.29594
Ilma, D., et al. (2021). A comparative study of national and international contracts document refers to the FIDIC standard on construction projects in Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.17-7-2020.2303003
Indah, V. F., et al. (2023). How are companies involved in the construction of the trans Sumatra toll road, in Indonesia? Role analysis and development policy. Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v7i3.2588
Indonesia. (2017). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 tentang Jasa Konstruksi.
Irnanda, C. R., Sadalia, I., & Nazaruddin. (2022). Contract analysis for design and build lump sum price. In Advances in economics, business and management research (p. 1162). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-008-4_143
Kalogeraki, M., & Antoniou, F. (2024). Claim management and dispute resolution in the construction industry: Current research trends using novel technologies. Buildings, 14(4), 967. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14040967
Kesek, R. A. E., & Hardjomuljadi, S. (2020). Analisis red clause kontrak konstruksi APBD dengan FIDIC Red Book 1999. Konstruksia, 11(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.24853/jk.11.2.103-126
Lin, Q., Yan, L., & Yin, Y. (2023). Trust or fairness is more important: Research on the mechanism of contract risk allocation inducing contractor to consummate performance behavior. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 22(5), 2946. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2023.2172323
Nuranto, A. (2024). Potential supervision consultant contract disputes due to extension of contractor time in DKI Jakarta regional government project based on Fidic White Book. ASTONJADRO, 13(1), 283. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v13i1.14772
Nurhayati, Y., Ifrani, I., & Said, M. Y. (2021). Metodologi normatif dan empiris dalam perspektif ilmu hukum. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v2i1.14
Rahmadani, R., & Raodah, P. (2023). Esensi perbuatan pemerintah dalam melakukan kontrak kerja sama pengadaan barang dan jasa dengan pihak swasta. Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.29303/risalahkenotariatan.v4i1.80
Ramadhani, K. S., Fahamsyah, E., & Ali, M. (2023). Perlindungan hukum bagi penyedia atas pemutusan sepihak kontrak konstruksi dalam pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah. Equivalent Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial Teknik, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.59261/jequi.v6i1.168
Rasool, S., et al. (2025). Unified risk approach for construction contracts: A comparative analysis of NEC, JCT, and FIDIC from a contractor’s perspective. 1(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/3067-4883.1743
Seneviratne, K., & Michael, G. V. (2018). Disputes in time bar provisions for contractors’ claims in standard form of contracts. International Journal of Construction Management, 20(4), 335. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1484854
Simanjuntak, J. O., et al. (2021). Analisa kontrak proyek konstruksi di Indonesia. Jurnal Visi Eksakta, 2(2), 205. https://doi.org/10.51622/eksakta.v2i2.394
Sinaga, I. P. A. S., Sabela, L. S., & Kuang, T. J. (2024). Analisis komparatif perbandingan hukum perjanjian di Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat. Fairness and Justice Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 22(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.32528/faj.v22i1.22462
Susetya, I. G. P. H., Diantha, I. M. P., & Landra, P. T. C. (2018). Adaptasi doktrin promissory estoppel dalam penyelesaian ganti rugi pada tahap prakontrak pada hukum kontrak di Indonesia. Acta Comitas, 3(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2018.v03.i01.p08
Syaputra, T., & Qibtiyyah, R. M. (2022). Pengaruh pembangunan jalan tol trans Sumatra (JTTS) terhadap penerimaan pajak pusat. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 22(3), 1611. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v22i3.2604
Tembo-Silungwe, C. K., & Khatleli, N. (2017). A conceptual model for risk allocation in the construction industry. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 14(7), 690. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2017.690.700
Vu, N. V., et al. (2025). Type of the paper: Article. SSRN Electronic Journal [Preprint]. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5384374
