The Effectiveness of the Administrative Authority of the Regional Cultural Preservation Office VIII in Managing the Banten Girang Site
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65310/vtxj1480Keywords:
Cultural Heritage Preservation, Legal Effectiveness, Institutional Governance, Banten Girang Site, Legal Protection.Abstract
This study examines the effectiveness of the Regional Cultural Preservation Office Region VIII in managing the Banten Girang Site as an effort to preserve cultural heritage within the framework of legal protection and administrative governance. This research applies an empirical juridical method with a qualitative descriptive approach through interviews, and document analysis. The findings indicate that the management of the Banten Girang Site has been implemented through preventive preservation measures, periodic technical assessments, supervision by site custodians, and limited public outreach activities. However, the implementation has not yet reached optimal effectiveness due to several constraints, including unclear administrative authority, limited budget support, inadequate infrastructure, and suboptimal inter-institutional coordination. The study further identifies that sustainable preservation requires legal certainty, institutional harmonization, stronger fiscal support, community participation, and revitalization of supporting facilities. The findings affirm that effective cultural heritage preservation depends on the integration of legal substance, institutional capacity, administrative consistency, and public awareness. Strengthening collaborative governance is therefore essential to ensure the long-term sustainability of the Banten Girang Site as a historical and educational asset.
Downloads
References
AlyAzka, A., et al. (2025). Peran bahasa Indonesia dan keberagaman budaya dalam mempertahankan identitas nasional di era globalisasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Transformatif, 4(2), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.9000/jpt.v4i1.2116
Ariesta, W. (2022). Prinsip hukum dalam pemanfaatan cagar budaya. YURIJAYA: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 4(3), 320–333. https://doi.org/10.51213/yurijaya.v4i3.90
Arifin, H. P. (2018a). Politik hukum cagar budaya dalam perlindungan identitas bangsa Indonesia. Veritas et Justitia, 4(2), 470–492. https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v4i2.3008
Arifin, H. P. (2018b). Politik hukum perlindungan cagar budaya di Indonesia. Dialogia Iuridica: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis dan Investasi, 10(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v10i1.1034
Azeharie, S., Paramita, S., & Sari, W. P. (2019). Studi budaya nonmaterial warga Jaton. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 3(6), 1153–1162.
Azeharie, S., Paramita, S., & Sari, W. P. (2019). Studi budaya nonmaterial warga Jaton. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 3(6), 1153–1162. http://dx.doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v3i6.279
Aziz, N. A. A., et al. (2023). Community participation in the importance of living heritage conservation and its relationships with the community-based education model towards creating a sustainable community in Melaka UNESCO World Heritage Site. Sustainability, 15(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031935
Badri, A. (2021). Efektivitas kebijakan pembatasan sosial berskala besar (PSBB) di Indonesia ditinjau dari perspektif hukum. Jurnal Analisis Hukum, 2(2), 1–6.
Brandano, M. G., et al. (2025). Mapping cultural heritage sites at risk: A support tool for heritage sites management. Journal of Urban Management, 14(3), 690–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2025.01.007
Brata, Y. R., Wijayanti, Y., & Sudarto. (2022). Penyuluhan tentang arti pentingnya penetapan cagar budaya bagi juru pelihara di Kabupaten Ciamis. Abdimas Galuh, 4(2), 871–878. http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/ag.v4i2.7689
Efendi, J., & Ibrahim, J. (2016). Metode penelitian hukum normatif dan empiris. Prenadamedia Group.
Kelsen, H. (2013). Teori umum tentang hukum dan negara. Nusa Media.
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset dan Teknologi Nomor 33 Tahun 2022.
Khoirunnisa, S., et al. (2024). Perlindungan dan pengelolaan cagar budaya Situs Banten Girang berdasarkan Undang-Undang Cagar Budaya. BELEID: Journal of Administrative Law and Public Policy, 1(2), 117–137.
Muhaimin. (2020). Metode penelitian hukum. University Press.
Nurikah, & Jazuli, E. R. (2022). Legal study of protection of cultural heritage objectives in the old Banten tourism area. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum, 21(2), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v21i2.2271
Pemerintah Kabupaten Serang. (2006). Keputusan Bupati Serang Nomor 430/Kep.459-Huk/2006.
Permana, M. A. S., & Dewi, L. P. P. C. (2024). Pentingnya peranan masyarakat menjaga budaya dan tradisi Bali dalam pengembangan pariwisata. Jurnal Penelitian Mahasiswa Indonesia, 4(3), 229–236.
Republik Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Republik Indonesia. (2010). Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2010 tentang Cagar Budaya.
Republik Indonesia. (2022). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 tentang Register Nasional dan Pelestarian Cagar Budaya.
Ridwan, I., et al. (2019). Studi kebantenan dalam catatan sejarah. Media Edukasi Indonesia.
Ridwan, J., & Sudrajat, A. S. (2019). Hukum administrasi negara dan kebijakan pelayanan publik. Nuansa Cendekia.
Romli, et al. (2024). Perlindungan hukum. CV. Doki Course and Training.
Soekanto, S. (1998). Efektivitas hukum dan penerapan sanksi. CV. Ramadja Karya.
Sugiyanto, B. (2022). Era baru dalam kemitraan pengelolaan cagar budaya: Studi kasus Kalimantan. Naditira Widya, 16(2), 165–176.
Winarni, F. (2018). Aspek hukum peran serta masyarakat dalam pelestarian cagar budaya. Mimbar Hukum, 30(1), 94–109.
