Political Jurisprudence in Action: How Political Power Shapes Legal Outcomes in Southeast Asia
Keywords:
judicial independence, political influence, Southeast Asia, transparency, rule of lawAbstract
This study examines the phenomenon of political jurisprudence in Southeast Asia, emphasizing the persistent intersection between judicial institutions and political power. Using qualitative content analysis of regional reports, particularly the UNDP’s Judicial Integrity and Independence in Southeast Asia (2023–2024), the research identifies patterns of external pressure, limited transparency, and constrained judicial ethics across six ASEAN countries. Findings reveal that political influence remains prevalent in judicial appointments, decision-making, and resource allocation, reflecting structural dependence on the executive branch. Informal mechanisms such as patronage networks, selective sanctions, and budgetary control further weaken judicial autonomy and discourage resistance to political authority. These dynamics foster a culture of strategic conformity, where judicial decisions often align with dominant political interests rather than constitutional or human rights principles. Consequently, public trust in judicial integrity erodes, undermining both democratic accountability and access to justice. The study concludes that enhancing judicial independence in Southeast Asia requires not only institutional reform but also cultural transformation within the judiciary promoting ethical resilience, transparency, and professional integrity to resist political co-optation and strengthen the rule of law.
Downloads
References
Albarus, N. (2023). An Overview Of The Ongoing Legacies Of Colonialism In Contemporary Legal Systems In The Black Diaspora. Berkeley J. Afr.-Am. L. & Pol'y, 23, 15.
Anastacio, A., & Morandarte, N. (2023). Political Patronage In Philippine Local Politics. Available At Ssrn 4362736. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.2139/Ssrn.4362736.
Asiimwe, E. (2021). Corruption And The Judiciary: A Critical Study Of Uganda. Https://Hdl.Handle.Net/10566/18061.
Aziz, R. M. A. (2024). Election Disputes: A Comparative Analysis Of The Judicial Review Process In Malaysia And Indonesia. Iiumlj, 32, 297.
Chambers, P. (2024). Praetorian Kingdom: A History Of Military Ascendancy In Thailand. Iseas-Yusof Ishak Institute.
Choudhury, J. U. (2025). Judicial Interventions And Religious Conflict In India: A Constitutional Critique From The Global South. Third World Quarterly, 1-16. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/01436597.2025.2559368.
Chua, L. J. (2022). Constitutional Interpretation And Legal Consciousness: Out Of The Courts And Onto The Ground. International Journal Of Constitutional Law, 20(5), 1937-1957. Https://Doi.Org/10.1093/Icon/Moac110.
Dannhauer, P. (2023). Elite Role Conceptions And Indonesia's Leadership In The Association Of Southeast Asian Nations. Https://Doi.Org/10.25904/1912/5094.
Dressel, B. (2024). Informality And Judicial Decision-Making: The Role Of Judge Networks In Southeast Asia. Informality And Courts: Comparative Perspectives, 96-113. Https://Doi.Org/10.3366/Edinburgh/9781399535250.001.0001.
Dressel, B. (2024). Courts And Politics In Southeast Asia. Cambridge University Press.
Dressel, B., Inoue, T., & Bonoan, C. R. (2024). Justices And Political Loyalties: An Empirical Investigation Of The Supreme Court Of The Philippines, 1987–2020. Law & Social Inquiry, 49(2), 955-979. Https://Doi.Org/10.1017/Lsi.2022.103.
Duong, H. (2021). The Politicization Of Civil Service Recruitment And Promotion In Vietnam. Public Administration And Development, 41(2), 51-62. Https://Doi.Org/10.1002/Pad.1910.
Ezechi, D. E. (2024). Phenomenological Interpretation Of Judicial Corruption In Nigeria. Njiko: A Multi-Disciplinary Journal Of Humanities, Law, Education And Social Sciences, 2(1).
Heaven, C., Rocha Menocal, A., Von Billerbeck, S., & Zaum, D. (2022). From Elite Bargains To (More) Open And (More) Inclusive Politics.
Huchhanavar, S. (2022). Judicial Conduct Regulation: Do In-House Mechanisms In India Uphold Judicial Independence And Effectively Enforce Judicial Accountability?. Indian Law Review, 6(3), 352-386. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/24730580.2022.2068887.
Ihembe, M. A. (2022). Political Parties, Legal Regulations, And Candidate Selection In Nigeria's Fourth Republic (1999-2019) (Master's Thesis, University Of Pretoria (South Africa)).
Kisakye, D., & Stroh, A. (2024). Informality And Relations In International Judicial Appointments: Evidence From Sub-Regional Courts In Africa. The African Review, 1(Aop), 1-27. Https://Doi.Org/10.1163/1821889x-Bja10139.
Kosař, D., & Šipulová, K. (2023). Politics Of Judicial Governance. In Research Handbook On The Politics Of Constitutional Law (Pp. 262-285). Edward Elgar Publishing. Https://Doi.Org/10.4337/9781839101649.00024.
Matelski, M., Dijkstra, R., & Mcgonigle Leyh, B. (2022). Multi-Layered Civil Society Documentation Of Human Rights Violations In Myanmar: The Potential For Accountability And Truth-Telling. Journal Of Human Rights Practice, 14(3), 794-818. Https://Doi.Org/10.1093/Jhuman/Huac031.
Mcalister, M. E. (2023). White-Collar Courts. Vand. L. Rev., 76, 1155.
Mehmood, S. (2023). The Rule Of Law Approach For More Resilient Institutions: Judicial Accountability And Independence, And Global Economic Activities (No. 1418). Adbi Working Paper. Https://Doi.Org/Doi:10.56506/Fghq1674.
Mérieau, E. (2022). Democratic Breakdown Through Lawfare By Constitutional Courts: The Case Of Post. Pacific Affairs, 95(3), 475-496. Https://Doi.Org/10.5509/2022953475.
Michel, V. (2021). Institutional Design, Prosecutorial Independence, And Accountability: Lessons From The International Commission Against Impunity In Guatemala (Cicig). Laws, 10(3), 58. Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Laws10030058.
Michener, J. (2023). Legal Aid And Social Policy: Managing A Political Economy Of Scarcity. The Annals Of The American Academy Of Political And Social Science, 706(1), 137-158. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/00027162231200118.
Muhammad, R. (2025). Peranan Dan Problematika Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Positive Legislature Di Tengah Regresi Demokrasi Indonesia. Lex Renaissance, 10(1), 65-93. Https://Doi.Org/10.20885/Jlr.Vol10.Iss1.Art3.
Newbury, A. K. (2024). Constitutional Crisis Under The Big Sky: What Montana's Supreme Court Showdown Can Teach About Judicial Independence, Accountability, And Legitimacy For State Courts. J. App. Prac. & Process, 24, 87.
Ngoc, N. T., Vongphachanh, S., Ha-Duong, D., Ratsavong, S., Daosavanh, D., Sanamxay, S., & Ratsavong, L. (2025). Freedom Of Expression And Human Rights Violations Under Authoritarian Rule. International Journal Of Humanities, Management And Social Science (Ij-Humass), 8(1), 21-30. Https://Doi.Org/10.36079/Lamintang.Ij-Humass-0801.779.
Osman, S. K. (2025). Democracy And The Constitutional Monarchy In Malaysia: A Constitutional Analysis Of Monarchical Discretion And Democratic Legitimacy, 1983–2022. Jawi, 8(1), 103-116. Https://Doi.Org/10.24042/00202582772300.
Petkun, J., & Schottenfeld, J. (2025). The Judicial Administrative Power. Geo. Wash. L. Rev., 93, 349.
Rabkin, J. A., & Lerner, C. S. (2022). Criminal Justice Is Local: Why States Disregard Universal Jurisdiction For Human Rights Abuses. Vand. J. Transnat'l L., 55, 375.
Rawheath, P. (2023). Independent And Effective Adjudication In The Lower Courts Of South Africa. Http://Hdl.Handle.Net/11427/38152.
Rüland, J. (2022). Democratic Backsliding, Regional Governance And Foreign Policymaking In Southeast Asia: Asean, Indonesia And The Philippines. In Democratic Regressions In Asia (Pp. 237-257). Routledge.
Sakowicz, A. (2021). Suspect’s Access To A Lawyer At An Early Stage Of Criminal Proceedings In View The Case-Law Of The European Court Of Human Rights. Revista Brasileira De Direito Processual Penal, 7(3), 1979-2014. Https://Doi.Org/10.22197/Rbdpp.V7i3.565.
Shah, R. (2025). Corruption And Development In Asian Nations. Educohack Press.
Sumption, J. (2025). The Challenges Of Democracy: And The Rule Of Law. Profile Books.
Tamanaha, B. Z. (2021). Pragmatic Reconstruction In Jurisprudence: Features Of A Realistic Legal Theory. Canadian Journal Of Law & Jurisprudence, 34(1), 171-202. Https://Doi.Org/10.1017/Cjlj.2020.19.
Tatham, A. F. (2024). Nurturing Integration Through Dialogue: The Role Of Courts In Supranational Contexts. Edited By Giuseppe Martinico And Matteo Monti, 113.
Townend, J., & Welsh, L. (2023). The Human Impact Of Justice System Transparency. In Observing Justice (Pp. 93-119). Bristol University Press. Https://Doi.Org/10.51952/9781529228694.Ch005.
United Nations Development Programme (Undp). (2023). Judicial Integrity And Independence In Southeast Asia. Undp Asia-Pacific. Https://Www.Undp.Org/Asia-Pacific/Judicial-Integrity/Publications/Judicial-Integrity-And-Independence-Southeast-Asia
United Nations Development Programme (Undp). (2025). Judicial Integrity And Independence In Southeast Asia: Regional Report 2023–2024. Undp Asia-Pacific. Https://Www.Undp.Org/Sites/G/Files/Zskgke326/Files/2025 06/Judicial_Integrity_And_Independence_In_Sea_V2.Pd
Wang, F. (2024). Jurisprudential Foundation Of Public Interest Litigation. Frontiers L. China, 19, 299.
Ware, S. J. (2023). Judicial Selection That Fails The Separation Of Powers. Cath. Ul Rev., 72, 299.
Wintergerst, C. (2025). Consolidating Power: Strategies And Tactics Of Executive Aggrandizement The Autocratic Expansion Model In Indonesia, The Philippines, And Thailand (Doctoral Dissertation). Https://Doi.Org/10.11588/Heidok.00036670.
World Justice Project. (2022). Rule Of Law Index 2022. World Justice Project. Https://Worldjusticeproject.Org/Rule-Of-Law-Index.
Yam, J. (2024). Judging Under Authoritarianism. The Modern Law Review, 87(4), 894-925. Https://Doi.Org/10.1111/1468-2230.12861.
