Mechanism for Determining the Conclusion of Examination and Reopening of Arbitration Proceedings in the Perspective of Arbitration Procedural Law in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65310/b22p6r98Keywords:
Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitration, Legal Certainty, Proceedings, Reopening.Abstract
This article examines two essential mechanisms in the arbitration process: the determination of the closure of proceedings and the reopening of hearings. The closure of proceedings is a formal stage that signifies the completion of the evidentiary process and serves as the basis for the arbitral tribunal to begin deliberations and draft the final award. Meanwhile, the reopening of hearings is an extraordinary mechanism that may only be invoked under limited circumstances, such as the discovery of new evidence (novum), fraud, or significant procedural errors. This study employs a normative juridical method through an analysis of Law No. 30 of 1999, BANI Rules, and international arbitration instruments such as the ICC Rules. The findings indicate that these mechanisms must be carried out carefully in order to maintain a proper balance between efficiency, legal certainty, and substantive justice. The article underscores the importance of official documentation, procedural limitations, and the authority of arbitrators in managing both the closure of proceedings and reopening, ensuring that arbitration remains an effective dispute resolution forum.
Downloads
References
Anggraini, L. “Finalitas dan Efisiensi Arbitrase di Indonesia.” Journal of Indonesian Law and Society 7, no. 1 (2025): 85-104.
Apriadi, M. A., Nakiyah, N. E., Mahalia, M., & Suherman, A. (2025). Peranan Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Dalam Arbitrase Internasional Terhadap Kepastian Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis. Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik| E-ISSN: 3031-8882, 3(1), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.62379/gv7nd577
BANI Arbitration Center. BANI Arbitration Rules. Jakarta: BANI, 2025.
Brahmana, F. F. S., Rahmadani, A. M., Lubis, T. I. M., Syahputra, A., & Alqorni, A. (2024). Menyikapi Tantangan Pelaksanaan Arbitrase Di Indonesia. Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU, 1(3), 177-182. https://doi.org/10.70826/jcisnu.v1i3.518
Dodi, G. P., & Sh, M. (2022). Arbitrase Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Prenada Media.
Efendy, R. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Non Litigasi Pada Baitul Maal Wa Tamwil Ugt Sidogiri Cabang Pekanbaru Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Riau).
Harahap, M. Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata dan Arbitrase. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2020.
Hariyanto, B. (2024). Sinergitas Perguruan Tinggi dan Lembaga Arbitrase dalam Pembangunan Hukum Dibidang Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis. BANI Arbitration and Law Journal, 1(1), 58-70. https://doi.org/10.63400/balj.v1i1.5
International Chamber of Commerce. ICC Arbitration Rules 2021. Paris: ICC, 2021.
Manik, S. M. T., SHI, S., MH, C., Miftahur Rachman, S. H., & Kn, M. (2022). Hukum Acara Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Pada Peradilan Agama-Rajawali Pers. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Muspardi, M., Rifai, A., & Suartini, S. (2024). Tinjauan Yuridis Terkait Upaya Pemohon dan Termohon Atas Putusan Arbitrase Menurut Perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Jurnal Bedah Hukum, 8(1), 108-123. https://doi.org/10.36596/jbh.v8i1.1096
Nugroho, S. A., & Sh, M. H. (2017). Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase dan Penerapan Hukumnya. Kencana.
Pardamean Harahap, S. H. (2025). ARBITRASE PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN FINAL MENGIKAT Jilid 2: Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen yang bersifat Final Mengikat. Goresan Pena.
Pardamean Harahap, S. H. (2025). ARBITRASE PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN FINAL MENGIKAT Jilid 1: Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dan Arbitrase Perlindungan Konsumen Diperlukan di Indonesia. Goresan Pena.
Pratama, G.A. Arbitrase Modern: Prosedur Hukum dan Tantangan Global. Jakarta: Law & Policy Review Press, 2021.
Puspita, L. (2025). Kedudukan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional di Indonesia. Deepublish.
Ritonga, H. N., Sembiring, R. B., Manurung, N., & Samzidane, M. H. (2024). Kewenangan Arbitrase Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Di Indonesia. Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU, 1(2), 97-105. https://doi.org/10.70826/jcisnu.v1i2.247
Rohaini, S. H., MH, P. D., SH, M., & Sepriyadi Adhnan, S. H. (2024). Masa Depan Arbitrase Indonesia: Efektivitas dan Kepastian Hukum. Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia.
Shara, M. C. P. (2023). Upaya Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Di Indonesia Berdasarkan Perspektif Hukum Arbitrase Internasional. Kerta Dyatmika, 20(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.46650/kd.v20i1.1330
Vahzrianur, V., & Siswajanthy, F. (2025). Peran Arbitrase dalam Penyeleseaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan Menurut Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 1999. Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial, 4(2), 81-88. https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v3i3.3940
Wamnebo, F., TW, G. H., & Pandiangan, R. (2025). Kepastian Hukum Arbitrase Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Sesuai Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase Legal Certainty. SINERGI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 2(9), 4407-4421. https://doi.org/10.62335/sinergi.v2i9.1759
