Implementation of Sources of Civil Procedure Law and Limits of Judicial Authority in Civil Disputes: Case Study of Decision Number 791/Pdt.G/2024/PN Jkt.Utr

Authors

  • Mohammad Ammar Rasya Universitas Sriwijaya Author
  • Rafli Romadhon Universitas Sriwijaya Author
  • Muhammad Aidil Saputra Universitas Sriwijaya Author
  • Mesya Assauma Nurfitra Universitas Sriwijaya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65310/4y5vrf16

Keywords:

Civil Procedure Law, Judicial Competence, Unlawful Acts, Mediation, Principles of Justice.

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of civil procedural law sources and the limitations of judicial authority in civil disputes through a doctrinal legal analysis of Decision Number 791/Pdt.G/2024/PN Jkt.Utr. Employing statute, conceptual, and case approaches, the research analyzes the conformity of procedural norms under the Herziene Indonesisch Reglement, Article 1365 of the Civil Code, and Supreme Court regulations on mediation with the judicial reasoning applied in the case. The findings reveal that procedural law functions not merely as a formal framework but as a normative instrument that guides the admissibility of claims, the assessment of absolute and relative competence, and the proper exercise of judicial authority. Mediation and the principles of simple, swift, and cost-effective justice effectively enhance procedural efficiency while safeguarding the parties’ rights. The study demonstrates that adherence to procedural requirements and the systematic application of civil procedural norms enable courts to maintain legal certainty, uphold jurisdictional limits, and ensure equitable dispute resolution. This research contributes both theoretically and practically to the understanding of procedural law implementation in Indonesian civil courts.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Badri, S., Handayani, P., & Rizki, T. A. (2024). Ganti rugi terhadap perbuatan melawan hukum dan wanprestasi dalam sistem hukum perdata. Jurnal USM Law Review, 7(2), 974-985. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i2.9440.

Danis, A. H. (2025). Konsep Penerapan Wanprestasi dan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (PMH): Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 79/Pdt. G/2023/PN Yyk. Jaksa: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Politik, 3(4), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.51903/ehkgp369.

Dewanto, P. (2020). Rekonstruksi pertimbangan hakim terhadap putusan sengketa perdata berbasis nilai keadilan. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 5(2), 303-324. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v5i2.2307.

Hakim, M. A., & Amnesti, S. K. W. (2022). Problematika penanganan gugatan perbuatan melanggar hukum oleh pemerintah (onrechtmatige overheidsdaad) pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah, 14(1), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v14i1.15833.

Maksum, H. (2020). Batasan Kewenangan Mengadili Pengadilan Umum Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Yang Melibatkan Badan Negara Atau Pejabat Pemerintah. Juridica, 2(1), 4-16.

Mantili, R., & Sutanto, S. (2019). Kumulasi gugatan perbuatan melawan hukum dan gugatan wanprestasi dalam kajian hukum acara perdata di Indonesia. Dialogia Iuridica, 10(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v10i2.1210.

Muqaddas, B. (2002). Mengkritisi asas-asas hukum acara perdata. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 20(9), 18-31. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol9.iss20.art2.

Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Utara. (2025, November 19). Putusan Nomor 791/Pdt.G/2024/PN Jkt.Utr.

Rahmah, A., & Lubis, F. (2024). Analisis Strategi Hukum dalam Mempercepat Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Hakim Perdata. Judge: Jurnal Hukum, 5(02), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v5i02.569.

Ronaldo, R., & Sitepu, B. L. A. (2024). Kajian pembuktian tindak pidana penipuan melalui short message service (SMS). Jurnal Retentum, 6(1), 137-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.46930/retentum.v6i1.4255.

Rudy, D. G., & Mayasari, I. D. A. D. (2021). Keabsahan alat bukti surat dalam hukum acara perdata melalui persidangan secara elektronik. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 9(1), 167-174. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpku.v9i1.31440.

Sajian, A., & Alif, A. (2024). Sengketa Pertanahan dan Peran Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Penyelesaiannya: Analisis Hukum Agraria. SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, 3(4), 148-200. https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v3i4.1517.

Septesha, W. A., & Badriyah, S. M. (2023). Analisis Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Terhadap Obyek Sengketa Tanah Yang Dikuasai Orang Lain (Studi Putusan Nomor: 2490 K/Pdt/2015). AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(2), 2165-2176. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.3785.

Supryadi, A., Yuliani, T., & Mantika, A. F. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Kompetensi Absolute Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Dalam Memutus Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Oleh Komisi Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia:(Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 757/Pdt. g/2022/Pn Jkt Pst). Unizar Law Review, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.36679/ulr.v6i1.31.

Teguh, P. P. (2026). Putusan Sela Dalam Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia: Analisis Atas Fungsi Dan Kepastian Hukum. Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 7(1), 34-41. https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v7i1.1156.

Wahyudi, S. (2025). Kewenangan Hakim Tunggal dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Perdata Sederhana Berdasarkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2015. Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi, 2(9), 575-588. https://doi.org/10.71282/jurmie.v2i9.984.

Wicaksono, S., Bagas, B., & Reyhansyah, A. (2024). Penyelesaian Sengketa dan Konflik Pertanahan di Indonesia: Kajian Politik Hukum: Resolution of Land Disputes and Conflicts in Indonesia: A Study of Legal Politics. Dialogia Iuridica, 16(1), 068-095. https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v16i1.9993.

Winarti, O. (2025). Comparative Analysis of Supreme Court and State Administrative Court Decisions in Land Disputes of Former Building Use Rights Certificates (Case Study of Suroto in Semarang). Semarang State University Undergraduate Law and Society Review, 5(1), 483-519. https://doi.org/10.15294/lsr.v5i1.24770.

Zahra, K. L. A., Al Amjad, M. F. M., Maulidian, S. N., Silvia, S., & Asyifa, F. A. (2024). Relevansi Kepentingan Alat-Alat Bukti Dalam Proses Penyelesaian Hukum Perdata. The Juris, 8(1), 95-104. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v8i1.1185.

Zamroni, M. (2017). Kewenangan Hakim Mengadili Sengketa Kontrak. Halu Oleo Law Review, 1(1), 105-123. https://doi.org/10.33561/holrev.v1i1.2353.

Zia, H., Agusta, M., & Afriyanti, D. (2020). Pengetahuan Hukum Tent Ang Hukum Acara Perdata. Rio Law Jurnal, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.36355/.v1i2.404.

Published

2026-02-19

How to Cite

Implementation of Sources of Civil Procedure Law and Limits of Judicial Authority in Civil Disputes: Case Study of Decision Number 791/Pdt.G/2024/PN Jkt.Utr. (2026). Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry, 1(4), 30-40. https://doi.org/10.65310/4y5vrf16