Analysis of the Causes of High Product Rejection Rates in the Warehouse Area Using the Pareto Method, 5 Whys Analysis, and Fishbone Diagram

Authors

  • Rizal Deokosta Universitas Pelita Bangsa Author
  • Muhammad Ifdol Universitas Pelita Bangsa Author
  • Hilman Mubarik Aziz Universitas Pelita Bangsa Author
  • Immanuel Wijaya Huwae Universitas Pelita Bangsa Author
  • Yudi Prastyo Universitas Pelita Bangsa Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65310/5ev5xv84

Keywords:

Warehouse Management, Pareto Analysis, Fishbone Diagram, Five Whys, Quality Engineering.

Abstract

The high rate of product rejection within the warehouse area compromises spatial efficiency and escalates logistics expenses in automotive manufacturing. This empirical study constructs a structured diagnostic interventional framework using Pareto charts, Fishbone diagrams, and 5 Why analysis to mitigate storage quality failures. Baseline evaluations revealed that the initial defect rate peaked at 5.20% (520 rejected units), significantly violating the 3.0% corporate tolerance threshold, with material damage and misplacement contributing a substantial 76.92% cumulative total. To address these layout and procedural root causes, engineering interventions were deployed, including warehouse redesign, shared storage, rigid pallet stacking limitations, standardized visual labeling, and operator competency training. Post intervention comparative analysis demonstrated an exceptional recovery in operational reliability, successfully driving the rejection rate down to 2.8% (280 units). This systematic reduction demonstrates the robust efficacy of integrating statistical quality metrics with spatial engineering to achieve sustainable operational excellence in modern industrial warehousing.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, A., & Herdianzah, Y. (2023). Penerapan Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) untuk Peningkatan Efektivitas pada Pabrik Skincare di Kota Batam. Metode: Jurnal Teknik Industri, 9(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.33506/mt.v9i1.2298

Aldo, W., Parulian, L., & Yusi, D. (2022). Analisis cacat pada produk kemasan (karung) kedelai dengan menggunakan metode six-sigma dan fishbone diagram pada PT. FKS Multiagro tbk Surabaya. JENIUS: Jurnal Terapan Teknik Industri, 3(2), 149-158. https://doi.org/10.37373/jenius.v3i2.272

Aura, A. D., & Ramdhani, A. Y. (2026). Analisis Penyebab Variasi Jumlah Isi Kemasan Primer Tiap Kantong di Departement Produksi PT XYZ. Matrik: Jurnal Manajemen dan Teknik Industri Produksi, 26(2), 169-176. https://doi.org/10.30587/matrik.v26i2.11282

Chen, P. S., Chen, J. C. M., Shen, B. M., & Chen, G. Y. H. (2025). Implementation of Ford 8D in Improving Efficiencies of Wafer Testers: A Case Study. Engineering Management Journal, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2025.2478669

Devindra, S. N., Ananda, R., Munang, A., & Aliyah, K. (2025). Analisis Quality Control Proses Instalasi Jaringan PT. XYZ Dengan Metode Statistical Quality Control (SQC). Integrasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri, 10(1), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.32502/integrasi.v10i1.272

Dwiyanti, A., Khaerudin, D., & Saputra, T. D. (2026). Analisis Peningkatan Kualitas Kemasan Lindomin 865 SL 200 ml Menggunakan Metode Statistical Process Control di Perusahaan Agrokimia Merak. JOURNAL SAINS STUDENT RESEARCH, 4(2), 18-30. https://doi.org/10.61722/jssr.v4i2.9201

Gomaa, A. H. (2026). Achieving operational excellence in manufacturing supply chains using lean six sigma: a case study approach. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 17(2), 614-648. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-03-2024-0045

Heizer, J., Render, B., & Munson, C. (2020). Operations management: Sustainability and supply chain management (13th ed.). Pearson.

Imandha, D. S., Feriaty, S. R., & Listyanto, R. E. (2026). Analisis Waste Supply Part Dengan Pendekatan Six Sigma DMAIC. Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen Industri Terapan, 5(2), 1139-1147. https://doi.org/10.55826/jtmit.v5i2.1861

Ishikawa, K. (1986). Guide to quality control (2nd rev. ed.). Asian Productivity Organization.

Islamey, P. A. P., Riyadi, S., & Brata, F. A. (2026). Operational Performance Improvement Analysis Through Six Sigma Approach: Case Study at PT. Freight Express Surabaya. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis, 13(1), 718-729. https://doi.org/10.33096/jmb.v13i1.1455

Khan, S. A., Jaboa, A. G. H. B., & Ishtiaq, P. (2024). DMAIC methodology for productivity improvement of preventive maintenance in an oil and gas company. International Journal of Business Excellence, 32(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2024.135922

Kimmel, S. D., Rosenmoss, S., Bearnot, B., Weinstein, Z., Yan, S., Walley, A. Y., & Larochelle, M. R. (2022). Northeast Postacute Medical Facilities Disproportionately Reject Referrals For Patients With Opioid Use Disorder: Study examines post-acute medical facility rejection rates of referrals for patients with opioid use disorder. Health Affairs, 41(3), 434-444. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01242

Montgomery, D. C. (2019). Introduction to statistical quality control (8th ed.). Wiley.

Nugroho, I., Nugroho, A. A. A., & Prastyo, Y. (2024). Evaluasi Penerapan Metode DMAIC dalam Industri Manufaktur: Kajian Literatur. GLOBAL: Jurnal Lentera BITEP, 2(06), 201-219. https://doi.org/10.59422/global.v2i06.626

Purushothaman, K., & Ahmad, R. (2022). Integration of Six Sigma methodology of DMADV steps with QFD, DFMEA and TRIZ applications for image-based automated inspection system development: a case study. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 13(6), 1239-1276. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-05-2021-0088

Putri, A. H., Wahyudi, R., & Nugraha, A. T. (2025). Pendekatan Six Sigma Dengan Tahapan DMAI Terhadap Kualitas Pada Kemasan Gula. Teknoin, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/teknoin.vol30.iss1.art5

Raghuram, P., & Arjunan, M. K. (2022). Design framework for a lean warehouse–a case study-based approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(6), 2410-2431. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2020-0668

Richards, G. (2017). Warehouse management: A complete guide to improving efficiency and minimizing costs in the modern warehouse (3rd ed.). Kogan Page.

Rizani, N. C., & Laksmana, M. S. (2024). Analisis Evaluasi Metode Kerja pada Proses Pre-Delivery di PT. XYZ Menggunakan Fishbone Diagram dan 5W+ 1H. SAINSTECH: JURNAL PENELITIAN DAN PENGKAJIAN SAINS DAN TEKNOLOGI, 34(3), 76-86. https://doi.org/10.37277/stch.v34i3.2152

Subekti, A., Feriaty, S. R., & Maulidani, B. C. (2025). Implementasi Metode Six Sigma DMAIC Pada Proses Penerimaan Barang Di Warehouse Incoming PT XYZ. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 5(4), 2706-2725. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v5i4.19983

Sudiantoro, R. A., & Singgih, M. L. (2023). Waste Assessment Model untuk Peningkatan Produktivitas dalam Bisnis Jasa Bengkel. Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen Industri Terapan, 2(3), 930-940. https://doi.org/10.55826/jtmit.v4i3.1044

Sugiarto, M., & Suprayitno, D. (2023). Analysis of Factors Causing Logistics Warehouse Inventory Mismatch at PT Dai Nippon Printing Indonesia. Sinergi International Journal of Logistics, 1(1), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.61194/sijl.v1i1.12

Sulaiman, E., Prastyo, Y., Rizaldi, E. H., Derajat, S., & Setiawan, A. (2025). Analisis Faktor Penyebab Reject Pada Produk Abon Layers Untuk Meningkatkan Efesiensi Produksi Di Pt Slm Dengan Metode Alat Analis Kualitas. Journal of Management and Innovation Entrepreneurship (JMIE), 2(3), 2226-2237. https://doi.org/10.70248/jmie.v2i3.2281

Tsarouhas, P., & Sidiropoulou, N. (2024). Application of Six Sigma methodology using DMAIC approach for a packaging olives production system: a case study. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 15(2), 247-273. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-06-2022-0140

Vikaliana, R., & Arizqi, R. M. N. (2023). Analisis Keterlambatan Pengiriman Produk Jadi Di PT Tsuchiyoshi Procore Indonesia. Jurnal Industri dan Teknologi Terpadu, 6(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.47080/intent.v6i2.2891

Wulandari, R., & Azizah, F. N. (2024). Pengendalian Kualitas Produk Polyester Staple Fibre Menggunakan Metode Six Sigma di PT XYZ. UNISTEK, 11(2), 98-110. https://doi.org/10.33592/unistek.v11i2.4616

Downloads

Published

2026-06-22

How to Cite

Analysis of the Causes of High Product Rejection Rates in the Warehouse Area Using the Pareto Method, 5 Whys Analysis, and Fishbone Diagram. (2026). Journal of Engineering and Applied Technology, 2(1), 321-331. https://doi.org/10.65310/5ev5xv84