Optimizing the Fulfillment of Children's Rights to Education and Character Building in Conflict with the Law
A Case Study of the Bandar Lampung Class II LPKA
Keywords:
Fulfillment of the right to education, character development, social rehabilitation, access to formal education, juvenile recidivismAbstract
This study evaluates the implementation of formal education rights fulfillment and character development programs for juveniles in conflict with the law at the Class II Juvenile Correctional Facility (LPKA) in Bandar Lampung, while identifying key challenges and optimization strategies. A descriptive qualitative approach was employed, with data collected through observation, in-depth interviews, and document analysis. The findings reveal that administrative constraints (incomplete identity documents), an insufficient educator-to-student ratio, limited facilities, and minimal family support significantly hinder access to and the quality of formal education, as reflected in low participation rates and graduation outcomes below the national average. Character development initiatives encompassing religious, physical, and vocational training positively contribute to moral strengthening, reduction in disciplinary violations, and enhanced readiness for social reintegration, although full participation remains limited. Recommendations include accelerating the issuance of administrative identity documents, increasing the capacity and number of educational personnel, providing technology-based learning facilities, fostering external partnerships, and strengthening family involvement. An integrated strategy is expected to enhance the effectiveness of rehabilitation efforts and reduce the risk of juvenile recidivism.
Downloads
References
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1.
Barney, J. B., & Clark, D. N. (2007). Resource-based theory: Creating and sustaining competitive advantage. Oxford University Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513.
Gultom, R. F., & Israhadi, E. I. (2025). Legal uncertainty due to differences in children's age limits in legislation and harmonization efforts to prevent child discrimination. Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, 2(3), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.62383/majelis.v2i3.1037.
Herningsih, M. K., & Rahaditya, R. (2025). Stigmatisasi pada anak nakal dan bermasalah dengan hukum. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP), 5(3), 45–58.
Huberman, M., & Miles, M. B. (2002). The qualitative researcher's companion. Sage Publications.
Ibrahim. (2021). Rekonstruksi regulasi diversi dalam penyelesaian perkara anak berkonflik hukum pada tahap penyidikan berbasis nilai keadilan [Ringkasan disertasi, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung]. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Repository. http://repository.unissula.ac.id/id/eprint/12345.
Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: What it is and why it's here to stay. Corwin Press.
Kohlberg, L. (1963). The development of children's orientations toward a moral order: I. Sequence in the development of moral thought. Vita Humana, 6(1), 11–33.
Kongres Advokat Indonesia. (2019, July 23). Anak berhadapan hukum tertinggi, potret buram perlindungan anak. KAI.id. https://www.kai.id/detail_post/anak-berhadapan-hukum-tertinggi-potret-buram-perlindungan-anak.
Lapsley, D. K., & Narvaez, D. (2005). Moral psychology at the crossroads. In D. K. Lapsley & F. C. Power (Eds.), Character psychology and character education (pp. 18–35). University of Notre Dame Press.
Lestari, E. W. (2015). Partisipasi masyarakat dalam administrasi kependudukan (Kajian pada pengurusan akta kelahiran di Dinas Kependudukan dan Catatan Sipil Kota Surabaya). Publika, 3(6), 1–10. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/publika/article/view/12097.
Lickona, T. (1996). Eleven principles of effective character education. Journal of Moral Education, 25(1), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724960250110.
Maruna, S., & LeBel, T. P. (2012). The desistance paradigm in correctional practice: From programmes to lives. In F. McNeill, P. Raynor, & C. Trotter (Eds.), Offender supervision: New directions in theory, research and practice (pp. 65–87). Willan Publishing.
Minuchin, P. (2002). Looking toward the horizon: Present and future in the study of family systems. In J. P. McHale & W. S. Grolnick (Eds.), Retrospect and prospect in the psychological study of families (pp. 259–278). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 297.
Rosidah, N. (2020). Sistem peradilan pidana anak: Mewujudkan kepastian hukum terbaik bagi anak. Universitas Lampung Repository. https://repository.lppm.unila.ac.id/30353/1/Sistem%20Peradilan%20Anak.pdf
Uggen, C. (2000). Work as a turning point in the life course of criminals: A duration model of age, employment, and recidivism. American Sociological Review, 65(4), 529–546. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657381.
United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2023). Combined fifth and sixth periodic reports submitted by Indonesia under Article 44 of the Convention (Dokumen CRC/C/IDN/5-6). Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4000035.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Cici Dian Purnamasari, Rizqullah Nurwidya (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
