Representation of Gender Power Relations in the Film Dua Hati Biru: A Peirce Semiotic Analysis from Sylvia Walby's Patriarchy Perspective

Authors

  • Devia Tantri Rachmani Universitas Pancasakti Tegal Author
  • Imaniar Dwi Retno Pangesti Universitas Pancasakti Tegal Author
  • Ike Desi Florina Universitas Pancasakti Tegal Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65310/6smf5n22

Keywords:

gender power relations, patriarchy, semiotics, film representation, domestic labor.

Abstract

This study examines the representation of gender power relations in the film Dua Hati Biru using Charles Sanders Peirce’s semiotic analysis within the framework of Sylvia Walby’s theory of patriarchy. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach, the research analyzes selected scenes that depict wage labor, domestic labor, and workplace discrimination. The findings reveal that wage labor functions as the primary source of legitimacy and authority within family relations, regardless of gender, positioning economic control as the central axis of power. Domestic labor is portrayed as essential to family stability yet remains symbolically undervalued and naturalized as a moral obligation, particularly for women. Meanwhile, workplace discrimination is represented through implicit institutional norms that stigmatize women’s marital and maternal identities, compelling adaptation rather than structural change. Through icons, indexes, and symbols, the film constructs a subtle yet persistent patriarchal logic that normalizes gender inequality. This study concludes that Dua Hati Biru not only reflects social realities but also participates in reproducing patriarchal ideology by sustaining hierarchical distinctions between productive and reproductive labor within both domestic and professional spheres.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbar, F. N., Ramadhani, R. S., & Dewi, R. Z. (2025). Analisis semiotika John Fiske: Membedah makna kehadiran dalam film Beoning (2018). Jurnal SOMASI (Sosial Humaniora Komunikasi), 6(2), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.53695/js.v6i2.1474

Amalia, N., Afiyanti, D., Wibowo, W. L., Achdiani, Y., & Fatimah, S. N. (2025). Analisis disfungsi peran keluarga dalam representasi film Andai Ibu Tidak Menikah dengan Ayah. Liberosis: Jurnal Psikologi dan Bimbingan Konseling, 17(1), 441–450. https://ejournal.cibinstitut.com/index.php/liberosis/article/view/3880

Bungin, B. (2007). Penelitian kualitatif: Komunikasi, ekonomi, kebijakan publik, dan ilmu sosial lainnya. Kencana.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Dewanto, M. R. F., & Sanjaya, A. (2025). Resepsi penonton terhadap representasi maskulinitas hegemonik dalam tokoh utama film Argylle. Jurnal Indonesia: Manajemen Informatika dan Komunikasi, 6(3), 1575–1587. https://doi.org/10.63447/jimik.v6i3.1517

Febryanti, V., Botifar, M., & Misriani, A. (2024). Analisis gender dalam novel Hati Suhita karya Khilma Anis (Disertasi doktoral). Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup.

Husnah, A., Wahid, A., & Ulviani, M. (2025). Representasi bentuk budaya patriarki dalam film Tuhan Izinkan Aku Berdosa karya Hanung Bramantyo. Cakrawala Indonesia, 10(2), 184–197.

Kaestiningtyas, I., Anaziah, S., & Amalia, G. F. (2021). Representasi gender inequality dalam film Kim Ji-Young, Born 1982: Analisis wacana kritis Sara Mills. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 10(2), 166–176.

Khair, J. (2025). Representasi wanita muslimah dalam film horor Indonesia Munkar tahun 2024: Analisis semiotika Roland Barthes.

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Murti, A. S. (2022). Representasi budaya patriarki dalam film Yuni.

Putri, N. A., & Suparman, S. (2025). Analisis semiotika Roland Barthes: Representasi kesetaraan gender dalam film Dua Hati Biru. All Fields of Science Journal Liaison Academia and Society, 5(2), 456–463. https://doi.org/10.58939/afosj-las.v5i2.892

Salsabilla, S. N., Sa’diyah, L., Hermawan, A., & Hadi, S. (2025). Representasi novel Dua Garis Biru karya Lucia Priandarini dalam teori feminisme. Alfabeta: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pembelajarannya, 8(2), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.33503/alfabeta.v8i2.1356

Salvadhy, A. F. (2024). Analisis resepsi Srikandi UII terhadap patriarki dalam film (Studi analisis resepsi film Habibie & Ainun 3). https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/51555

Setyaningrum, A. N. A. (2023). Representasi dominasi patriarki dalam film Layla Majnun. Fakultas Dakwah dan Komunikasi, UIN Sunan Kalijaga.

Simeona, J., & Sukendro, G. G. (2025). Representasi gender dalam serial Gadis Kretek: Analisis semiotika Roland Barthes. Kiwari, 4(1), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.24912/ki.v4i1.33752

Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Taufik, A. (2017). Representasi patriarki dalam film Cinta Suci Zahrana. UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta. http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/27134

Tri Utami, D. (2021). Representasi ideologi patriarki pada film Kim Ji-Young Born 1982. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/52247

Utami, H. P. (2025). Representasi gender dalam film Tuhan Izinkan Aku Berdosa. An-Nida: Jurnal Komunikasi Islam, 17(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.34001/an-nida.v17i1.7883

Wardani, D. T. A., & Gusthini, M. (2025). The representation of patriarchy in the movie Enola Holmes 1: A feminist literary criticism. Alinea: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajaran, 5(3), 945–956. https://doi.org/10.58218/alinea.v5i3.2019

Wati, I., Ayuni, R. D., & Puspita, A. (2025). Analisis semiotika Roland Barthes: Representasi budaya patriarki dalam film Gadis Kretek. Komunikologi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.47007/jkomu.v22i01.1286

Wijaya, C., & Winduwati, S. (2025). Representasi peran ayah domestik: Kajian semiotika Roland Barthes pada film Dua Hati Biru. https://doi.org/10.24912/ki.v4i2.35001

Published

2026-01-08

How to Cite

Representation of Gender Power Relations in the Film Dua Hati Biru: A Peirce Semiotic Analysis from Sylvia Walby’s Patriarchy Perspective. (2026). Journal of Social Humanities and Education, 1(3), 01-0. https://doi.org/10.65310/6smf5n22