Technology, Society, and Sustainable Development: A Critical Integrative Review

Authors

  • Munir Ahmad Khan Gasura Muslim Youth (MY) University Author
  • Muhammad Munir Muslim Youth (MY) University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65310/370zc218

Keywords:

technology, society, sustainable development, digitalisation, digital divide, artificial intelligence, governance.

Abstract

Digital technologies increasingly influence the institutional, economic, social, and environmental pathways through which sustainable development is pursued. Existing research, however, remains dispersed across technological domains and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), with limited integration of distributional, environmental, and governance conditions in developing-country settings. This study conducts a qualitative critical integrative review of peer-reviewed and institutional literature published primarily between 2016 and 2026. Sources were identified purposively through academic databases, publisher platforms, and repositories of international organisations and assessed using explicit relevance criteria. The synthesis applies sociotechnical systems theory and the capability approach to examine digital technologies, artificial intelligence, and digital public infrastructure across social, economic, environmental, and governance dimensions. Three recurrent positions are identified in the literature: technology-optimist, technology-risk, and governance-conditioned perspectives. The reviewed evidence indicates that digital technologies can extend access to education, health services, financial services, public administration, and environmental monitoring, while benefits remain uneven where connectivity, affordability, skills, institutional capacity, and data governance are inadequate. Digitalisation also entails material and energy costs associated with data infrastructure, computation, hardware production, and electronic waste. The synthesis supports a conditional interpretation of technology's contribution to sustainable development: developmental effects depend on inclusive access, digital capability, environmental responsibility, accountable governance, institutional capacity, and international cooperation. The proposed framework remains an interpretive proposition requiring subsequent empirical evaluation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baldé, C. P., Kuehr, R., Yamamoto, T., McDonald, R., D’Angelo, E., Althaf, S., Bel, G., Deubzer, O., Fernandez-Cubillo, E., Forti, V., Gray, V., Herat, S., Honda, S., Iattoni, G., Khetriwal, D. S., di Cortemiglia, V. L., Lobuntsova, Y., Nnorom, I., Pralat, N., & Wagner, M. (2024). The global e-waste monitor 2024. International Telecommunication Union & United Nations Institute for Training and Research. https://www.itu.int/pub/D-GEN-E_WASTE.01-2024

Goh, H.-H., & Vinuesa, R. (2021). Regulating artificial-intelligence applications to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Discover Sustainability, 2, Article 52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-021-00064-5

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Singh, R. P., & Suman, R. (2021). Telemedicine for healthcare: Capabilities, features, barriers, and applications. Sensors International, 2, 100117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100117

Hariyani, D., Hariyani, P., & Mishra, S. (2025). Digital technologies for the Sustainable Development Goals. Green Technologies and Sustainability, 3(3), 100202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.grets.2025.100202

International Telecommunication Union. (2025). Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2025. https://www.itu.int/hub/publication/D-IND-ICT_MDD-2025-3/

Jamil, S. (2021). From digital divide to digital inclusion: Challenges for wide-ranging digitalization in Pakistan. Telecommunications Policy, 45(8), 102206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102206

Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2

Kaack, L. H., Donti, P. L., Strubell, E., Kamiya, G., Creutzig, F., & Rolnick, D. (2022). Aligning artificial intelligence with climate change mitigation. Nature Climate Change, 12(6), 518–527. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01377-7

Lythreatis, S., Singh, S. K., & El-Kassar, A.-N. (2022). The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121359

Nishant, R., Kennedy, M., & Corbett, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence for sustainability: Challenges, opportunities, and a research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 53, 102104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102104

OECD. (2022). Going digital guide to data governance policy making. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/40d53904-en

OECD. (n.d.). Digital transformation. Retrieved October 6, 2026, from https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/policy-issues/digital-transformation.html

Oosterlaken, I. (2011). Inserting technology in the relational ontology of Sen’s capability approach. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 12(3), 425–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2011.576661

Ragnedda, M. (2017). The third digital divide: A Weberian approach to digital inequalities. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315606002

Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/146498805200034266

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1). https://undocs.org/A/RES/70/1

United Nations. (2024). Global Digital Compact. https://www.un.org/pact-for-the-future/en/global-digital-compact

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2024). Digital economy report 2024: Shaping an environmentally sustainable and inclusive digital future. United Nations. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789213589779

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501

United Nations Environment Programme. (n.d.). Digitalization for sustainability. Retrieved October 6, 2026, from https://www.unep.org/topics/digital-transformations/digitalization-sustainability

van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.

Vinuesa, R., Azizpour, H., Leite, I., Balaam, M., Dignum, V., Domisch, S., Felländer, A., Langhans, S. D., Tegmark, M., & Fuso Nerini, F. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Communications, 11, Article 233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14108-y

World Bank. (2016). World development report 2016: Digital dividends. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0671-1

World Bank. (2024). Digital progress and trends report 2023. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-2049-6

Zheng, Y. (2009). Different spaces for e-development: What can we learn from the capability approach? Information Technology for Development, 15(2), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/itdj.20115

Zhuk, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence impact on the environment: Hidden ecological costs and ethical-legal issues. Journal of Digital Technologies and Law, 1(4), 932–954. https://doi.org/10.21202/jdtl.2023.40

Downloads

Published

2026-08-28

How to Cite

Technology, Society, and Sustainable Development: A Critical Integrative Review. (2026). Journal of Social Humanities and Education, 2(1), 284-292. https://doi.org/10.65310/370zc218